Corporate governance and green innovation performance: a TCCM-based systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55429/ijabf.v5i2.427Keywords:
Corporate governance, Green innovation, ESG disclosure, Board diversity, Sustainable performanceAbstract
This study reviews and synthesizes literature linking corporate governance mechanisms to green innovation performance. It examines how board structure, ownership patterns, executive incentives, and ESG practices shape firms' pursuit of sustainability-driven innovation across institutional contexts. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) protocol and TCCM (Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology) framework, the review analyses 213 articles published between 2015 and 2025. Bibliometric mapping and content analysis identify foundations, methodological trends, and differences in the governance-innovation nexus. Findings show that board diversity, independence, and environmental competence improve green innovation performance by supporting perspectives and stakeholder responsiveness. Ownership structure, CEO duality, and ESG disclosure influence innovation outcomes, with effects varying by institutional quality and industry context. Quantitative and single-theory approaches dominate, highlighting the need for integrated frameworks and methods. The study positions governance as both a compliance mechanism and a driver of competitiveness and value creation, providing a synthesis and a research agenda for sustainability-focused corporate governance.
References
Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Oropallo, E., & Riccio, E. (2022, April 1). A first bibliometric literature review on Metaverse. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCONEUROPE54743.2022.9802015
Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
Chen, M., Liu, S., & Gao, L. (2024). Digital finance, financial flexibility and corporate green innovation. Finance Research Letters, 70, 106313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106313
Chen, N., Yan, N., Xie, H., & Ou, Y. (2024). Impact of media attention on corporate green innovation: What is the role of dual environmental regulation? International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103553
Chouaibi, S., & Fadhli, M. (2026). Corporate governance and integrated reporting quality: Does green innovation moderate the relationship? A G20 perspective. Managerial Finance, 52(2), 356-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2024-0858
Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101
Chu, S. (2024). Are women greener? Board gender diversity and corporate green technology innovation in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 1001-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.04.005
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Marin, G., & Paglialunga, E. (2017). Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038
Ding, J., Lu, Z., & Yu, C. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and firms' green innovation: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 81, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.007
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2017). World class sustainable supply chain management: critical review and further research directions. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 332-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2015-0112
Fang, L. (2024). Corporate digitalization and green innovation: Evidence from textual analysis of firm annual reports and corporate green patent data in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 3936-3964. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3677
Fang, Z., Kong, X., Sensoy, A., Cui, X., & Cheng, F. (2021). Government's awareness of environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 294-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.03.003
Fei, W., Wei, F., Chunxia, Z., & Zhen, W. (2022). The impact of environmental, social, and governance, board diversity and firm size on the sustainable development goals of registered firm in China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 668-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2100438
Flammer, C., & Bansal, P. (2017). Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1827–1847. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45105062
Gur, F. A., & Greckhamer, T. (2025). Coopetition in practice: Managerial practices for navigating cooperation with competitors. European Management Journal, 44(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.01.003
Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., & Jaya-Montalvo, M. (2020). Research Trends in Geotourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database. Geosciences, 10(10), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100379
Javeed, S. A., Latief, R., & Akram, U. (2023). The effects of board capital on green innovation to improve green total factor productivity. Sustainability, 15(13), 10023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310023
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Ji, H., Yu, Z., Tian, G., Wang, D., & Wen, Y. (2025). Market competition, environmental, social and corporate governance investment, and enterprise green innovation performance. Finance Research Letters, 77, 107057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107057
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Li, J., Lian, G., & Xu, A. (2023). How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113648
Lin, X., Yu, L., Zhang, J., Lin, S., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Board gender diversity and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(22), 15020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215020
Liu, X., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Wang, C., & Wang, L. (2025). Can green finance policy reduce corporate carbon emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. The British Accounting Review, 57(5), 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101540
Lu, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, L., & Shi, G. (2024). ESG ratings and green innovation. Sustainability, 16(24), 10869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410869
Ma, J., & Chang, C. (2023). The Role of Green Finance in Green Innovation: Global Perspective from 75 Developing Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(10), 3109-3128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2023.2210720
Mohy-ud-Din, K. (2024). ESG reporting, corporate green innovation and the interaction role of board diversity: A new insight from U.S. firms. Innovation and Green Development, 3(4), 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100161
Mohy‐ud‐Din, K., Shahbaz, M., & Du, A. M. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and climate change mitigation: Discovering the interaction role of green audit and sustainability committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1198-1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3011
Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., Savino, T., & Albino, V. (2017). Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0516
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., & Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019). Gradual internationalization vs. born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 830-858. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280
Qin, X., Muskat, B., Ambrosini, V., Mair, J., & Chih, Y.-Y. (2025). Green innovation implementation: A systematic review and research directions. Journal of Management, 52(1), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241312656
Shabbir, M. S. (2025). Corporate Sustainability Reimagined: A Bibliometric-Systematic literature review of governance, Technology, and Stakeholder‐Driven Strategies for SDG Impact. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 9203-9222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70070
Shan, H., Zhao, K., & Liu, Y. (2024). ESG performance and the persistence of green innovation: empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Multinational Business Review, 33(2), 268-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-04-2024-0060
Shi, X., Xu, W., Cao, X., & Hou, Y. (2023). Can minority shareholders' "hand-voting" promote green innovation of Enterprises-Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1225509
Shui, X., Zhang, M., Smart, P., & Ye, F. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance for environmental innovation: A configurational analysis on board capital, CEO power and ownership structure. Journal of Business Research, 149, 786-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.037
Singh, S. K., Chen, J., Del Giudice, M., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2020). Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: Role of environmental training. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.032
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Volquez, G. M., Renukappa, S., Suresh, S., Das, S., & Veenith, T. (2025). Evaluation of drivers for sustainable business model innovation: TISM and Fuzzy MICMAC approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-01-2025-0016
Wang, C. (2019). How organizational green culture influences green performance and competitive advantage. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(4), 666-683. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-09-2018-0314
Wang, J., Ma, M., Dong, T., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance's ESG ratings. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102623
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262232586/econometric-analysis-of-cross-section-and-panel-data/
Wu, J., Liu, B., Zeng, Y., and Luo, H. (2022). Good for the firm, good for the society? Causal evidence of the impact of equity incentives on a firm's green investment. International Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.10.013
Xue, Y., Jiang, C., Guo, Y., Liu, J., Wu, H., & Hao, Y. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and high-quality development: Do green innovation, environmental investment and corporate governance matter? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(11), 3191-3214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2034616
Yang, C., Zhu, C., & Albitar, K. (2024). ESG ratings and green innovation: A U‐shaped journey towards sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4108-4129. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3692
Yang, Z., Guo, B., Yuan, X., Lou, H., Gao, D., & Noda, T. (2025). Firm-level climate policy uncertainty and corporate green innovation: evidence from Chinese firms. Environment Development and Sustainability, 28(4), 10349-10371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06105-7
Zhang, C., & Chen, D. (2023). Do environmental, social, and governance scores improve green innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese-listed companies. Plos One, 18(5), e0279220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279220
Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2023). Study on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Green Innovation Performance-Evidence from Listed Companies in China A-Shares. Sustainability, 15(20), 14750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014750
Zheng, M., Feng, G.-F., Jiang, R.-A., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1670-1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3211
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dolly Bhati, Shikha Mittal Shrivastav

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal. Your article will be published open-access, but you will not have to pay an APC (article processing charge) - publication is free. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work. The licence terms may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Accepted 2026-10-16
Published 2026-11-06
